Forbidden Sites

There are so many web sites in Internet and some of them are forbidden by government because of some reasons. And we cannot make entry these web sites but I think the government doesn't have right to do this. The first reason is that we are free and the government doesn't decide whether or not these web sites are insecure for us in behalf of us. The second reason is that we need to entire these web sites and we want to access some information. The last reason is that we pay for these web sites so we have right to entire these web sites. There are some people who don't agree with me. They think that certain web sites are hazardous so the government can ban them. But it is related with us, if we think that a web site is risky for us we can enclose them so there is no need to forbid these web sites.

FREE DOWNLOADİNG

We have right to download MP3s, films and other programs from the Internet, because the cost of the cds and films is too high for us and we cannot afford buying them. And although the cost of them isn't so high, we are taking them higher than their cost because of duty. Furthermore even if we download them, the singers and producer make profit them. But some people think that even though cds and films' cost is high for us we shouldn't download them and we should wait and listen or watch them radio or tv. But if we are poor and don't take them, what can we do? Should we wait? I think if they don't care whether we can take them or not, we can download them. Maybe if they sell us them a fair price, we can take them and we won't download them. I hope we don't need download them and we can take anything we want.

FREE DOWNLOADİNG

Thesis statement: We have right to download MP3s, films and different software programs from the Internet.
Supporting sentence 1:Sometimes, we cannot afford buying a cd or film so we can download them.
Supporting sentence 2:Although a cd' cost is low, we are taking them higher than their cost.
Opponent sentence:Some cds and films can be too high for us but we can wait and listen or watch them in radio or tv.

EUTHASANIA

There are some people who can't live a normal life, they are incurable patients so they must be alive with support machines but some people think if doctors think that a patient can't recover, doctors can kill them. But I think neither doctors nor patients' families don't have the right to kill patients. The first reason is that maybe the patient doesn't want to die, he or she wants to live. The second reason is that a patient may recover even though she or he is incurable patient. And the last one is a patient who is even in coma can feel everything and know what happens so I think we should give chances them to live and we should't be in support of euthasania.

We are in METU and we have two types of course. One of them is must courses and the other one is elective courses.But we find some courses hard and we want that this courses can be elective courses. One of them is literature and according to me literature should be elective in our first year in the university. Of course, there are many students who want to take this course but at the same time we come to university this year and we don't know how we can be succesful in this course. For so many students, literature is a hard lesson and unnecessary, in addiction to this some student don't even like Turkish literature. I think we should take this course but not this year, because we are strange to this course and there are too many words in poems that we don't know. This course can be must course in our second or third year but ıf a student wants to take this course in his or her first year, of course she or he can take this. Finally, literature is a difficult course and should be elective course.

ATTENDANCE TO THE CLASSES IN THE UNIVERSITIES SHOULD BE OPTIONAL FOR STUDENTS.BECAUSE, THE STUDENTS WHO STUDY IN UNIVERSITY CAN COMPENSATE THEİR LESSONS. AND STUDENTS CAN DECIDE THIS.

Online education or face to face education

Should education be online or face to face? Of course, both of them can be beneficial for a student but I think education in traditional way is more appropraite for pupils because in online education a child can't concentrate on his or her course. But some children may be succesful in online education. In fact, it depends on the learners so some children choose online education but the other choose face to face education. Each of them has advantages but in the same time they have disadvantages. For example in face to face education if a student doesn't love his or her teacher, he or she can't be succesful. On the other hand in online lesson a child can abuse it for instance, he or she doesn't interest in his or her lesson instead of this he or she can chat in internet and he or she can fall behind his or her friends. As I say it depends on children. I think the education should be mixture of them, in this way all children can benefit this.